Posted on Twitter
about 5 hours ago

The Earmark Battle in Washington

By Jeb Hensarling

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

I engage in daily battles to protect the economic security of families and individuals across Texas and the nation. One of the important fights I have been leading for years is the effort to get rid of wasteful congressional earmarks once and for all.

The American people are starting to realize that too often earmarks are about using their paychecks to preserve a Congressman's or Senator's paycheck. Democrats claimed they would clean up the earmark process, but the taxpayers still see campaign contributions coming in one end of the Beltway and earmarks coming out the other.

I am outraged - as are millions of hardworking taxpayers - that while Americans are struggling to pay higher gasoline prices, higher food prices, and higher health care premiums, Washington is spending tax dollars on "Fruit Fly Research" in Paris, France, "Monuments to Me" in New York City and a "Lobster Musuem" in Maine. I wish I could say these were the only earmarks that Washington approved last year, but Congress approved 11,607 other earmarked projects.

As Chairman of the Republican Study Committee, a 110-member caucus of the most conservative Republicans in the U.S. House, I am encouraging Republicans of all stripes to swear off earmarks and to stand behind the McCain-Palin ticket on this issue. Earmarks represent the victory of seniority over merit, special interests over the national interest and secrecy over transparency. It is time for change!

John McCain has repeatedly said he will veto any spending bill that contains "even one earmark" - and Sarah Palin HAS vetoed earmarks as Governor of Alaska. That is my kind of President and Vice President.

I can't think of a better way for Republicans to win back our mantle of fiscal accountability than winning the earmark battle in Washington. I applaud Senator John Cornyn for standing up on this issue. Earlier this year, he co-sponsored a year-long moratorium on pork barrel earmark spending in the Senate.

As Republicans, we are not naïve when it comes to government spending. We know that Social Security and Medicare must be reformed for future generations. We know that some federal bureaucracies have grown out of control. I know that earmarks comprise on a fraction of our federal budget - although I hope I am never in Washington so long that I consider $25-30 billion just a "little bit of money" - but my point is that to change Washington, we must change the culture of spending.

As my dear friend Senator Tom Coburn has said, earmarks are "a gateway drug on the road to spending addiction. On far too many occasions, colleagues have told me, "I know that bill costs way too much, but I had to vote for it because I worked so hard for those earmarks." There is no core conservative value to be defended in the Congressional earmarking process. I am hoping that we are finally getting some traction on this issue in Washington with more members from the Senate and the House signing on to personal moratoriums and a Presidential team that is campaigning on this issue.

In order for Republicans to regain our brand of fiscal responsibility, we must be leaders in rooting out wasteful earmarks.

Comments

Amy Romanus said…
 

All human actions have the common goal of comprehending or shaping our understanding and man has developed numerous subjective and objective branches of learning: economics, morality, philosophy, sociology, psychology, and so on.

Enormous amounts of time and money are invested in data collection and analysis in the attempt to predict human trends. Implicit in this frenzied search is the expectation of finding some ultimate "answer," which will allow us to solve the problems of the economy, crime, national health, or politics. Nevertheless so far, we have not solved any of these problems at all.

It is not that we lack information; in fact, we are virtually drowning in it. The obstacle is that we do not have the proper tools to understand the meaning of our data. Understanding does not proceed simply from examining data; it comes from examining data in a particular context. Information is useless until we know what it means.

Society constantly expends its efforts to correct "effects" instead of "causes," which is one reason why the development of human consciousness proceeds so slowly. While this random search for solutions has resulted in a maze of bewildering complexity, true answers always have the characteristic of simplicity. The basic law of our world is economy and we must not waste a single piece of knowledge; everything serves a purpose and fits into a balance there are no unconnected events.

Man will always be trapped until he can learn to look beyond apparent causes. From history, we may note that answers never come from identifying "causes" in the world. Instead, it's necessary to identify the conditions that underlie the perceived causes; No definitive answer to any problem can be found by isolating sequences of events and projecting upon them a mental notion of "causality." There are no causes within our society today, only effects.

The difference in finding effective means reduces itself, on examination, to our inability to discriminate the essential from the nonessential. As a result, there has been no system affording a method by which to distinguish powerful and effective solutions from vulnerable, fruitless ones. Our means of evaluation themselves have been inherently incapable of performing a realistic assessment.

Societal choices, more often than not, are the result of expediency, statistical fallacy, sentiment, political or media pressure, or personal prejudice and vested interest. Crucial decisions affecting the lives of everyone on the planet are made under conditions that virtually guarantee failure, because societies lack the necessary reality base for formulation of effective problem resolutions, they fall back, over and over, on war, law, taxation, rules, and regulations which is extremely costly, instead of employing ability, which is very economical.

That is why John Cornyn, I will say it again and again, if we educate our human capital, the economy will correct itself; we must get back to the basics of education, "The art of life is not controlling what happens to us, but using what happens to us."

 

Like all great oaks, this understanding begins with a small acorn.

Jaymi Decartes said…
Earmarks are horrible and while the simulus package had a bunch of them embedded in it, I believe Cornyn is the best man for the job.
Peter Edelstein said…

As Republicans, we are not naïve when it comes to government spending. We know that Social Security and Medicare must be reformed for future generations. We know that some federal bureaucracies have grown out of control. I know that earmarks comprise on a fraction of our federal budget - although I hope I am never in Washington so long that I consider $25-30 billion just a "little bit of money" - but my point is that to change Washington, we must change the culture of spending.

--what more needs to be said, Cornyn 08

Davis Connelly said…
Great message on earmarks Senator, you have my vote on the 4th.
Tyler Fritz said…

Earmarks ARE gateway drug on the road to spending addiction, thank you for wanting to get rid of wasteful spending.

Bloggers for Cornyn

Want to display a button in support of John Cornyn on your blog? Click here to choose one!

The opinions expressed by the bloggers on this site and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not reflect the opinions of the Texans for Senator John Cornyn. Texans for Senator John Cornyn is not responsible for the accuracy of any of the information supplied by the bloggers.